Size:
4
Pay in installments of $6.83 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 2 - Jul 7
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
dresser coupling Dresser Style 40 Coupling | Cast/Ductile Iron 4 - (4.74 inDescription Dresser Long Body Coupling Style 40 Long Body Coupling Cast & Ductile Iron Pipe Long body bolted sleeve coupling for plain end cast iron and ductile iron pipe in nominal sizes 4 in through 24 in. Bridges wider than normal pipe gaps with a single coupling no spool pieces, no extra fittings. Sizes 4 in 24 in NSF 61 & 372 Approved Fusion Bonded Epoxy ID OD Grade 27 BUNA S Gasket AWWA C111 Bolting 3 8 in Expansion Contraction Standard pipe
Description
Dresser Long Body Coupling
Style 40 Long Body Coupling
Cast & Ductile Iron Pipe
Long body bolted sleeve coupling for plain-end cast iron and ductile iron pipe in nominal sizes 4 in through 24 in. Bridges wider-than-normal pipe gaps with a single coupling — no spool pieces, no extra fittings.
Sizes 4 in – 24 in
NSF 61 & 372 Approved
Fusion-Bonded Epoxy ID/OD
Grade 27 BUNA-S Gasket
AWWA C111 Bolting
3/8 in Expansion/Contraction
Standard pipe gap, no large separation? For typical butt-to-butt CIP/DIP joining where the pipe ends are close together, the shorter-body Dresser Style 138 is the lower-cost choice and delivers the same expansion/contraction performance.
View Style 138 →
Overview
The Dresser Style 40 Long Body Coupling is an engineered mechanical sleeve coupling designed for plain-end cast iron (CIP) and ductile iron pipe (DIP) where pipe ends are widely separated — a common field condition during repairs, replacements, and installations where a standard-body coupling cannot span the gap. Structurally similar to the Style 38, the Style 40 uses a longer middle ring with a larger belly diameter to bridge gaps that would otherwise require a spool piece, additional fittings, or pipe cutting on both sides of the joint.
Despite the added length, the Style 40 delivers the same joint performance as the Style 38 — absorbing up to 3/8 in of expansion and contraction per joint — making it suitable for service subject to thermal cycling, ground settlement, or vibration. Installation requires only a wrench. No threading, beveling, or precise pipe alignment is needed.
Key Features
Bridges Wide Pipe Gaps
Extended middle ring with larger belly diameter spans wider-than-normal pipe separations without spool pieces or additional fittings.
3/8 in Joint Movement
Absorbs up to 3/8 in of expansion and contraction per joint — identical performance to Style 38 despite the longer body.
NSF 61 & 372 Approved
Certified for potable water service with Grade 27 BUNA-S gasket and fusion-bonded epoxy ID/OD coating as standard.
Tool-Only Installation
No threading, beveling, or pipe alignment required. Installs with standard hand tools directly in the field or ditch.
Angular Deflection
Allows pipe curves to be laid using straight pipe segments without bends or elbows.
Sizes 4 in – 24 in
Standard waterworks range for CIP, DIP, and PVC. Special and larger sizes available on request.
Materials of Construction
Followers
AISI C1012 or ASME SA36
Steel
Middle Ring
ASTM A513 / A635 / SA675 Gr.60
Long body steel sleeve
Bolts & Nuts
AWWA C111 / ANSI A21.11
Black E-coated steel as standard
Gasket
Grade 27 BUNA-S
Potable water safe
Standard Coating
Fusion-Bonded Epoxy ID/OD
Factory-applied
Optional Coating
Dresser RED-D Shopcoat
Available on request
Sizes & Specifications — Cast Iron / Ductile Iron Pipe
| Nominal Size | Outside Diameter (in) | Middle Ring (in) | Bolts (No. × Diam × Length) | Gasket Grade | Part Number | Weight (lbs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 in | 4.74 – 5.06 | .299 × 12 | 4 — 5/8 × 15 | 27 | 0040-9203-003 | 29 |
| 6 in | 6.84 – 7.16 | .250 × 16 | 6 — 5/8 × 17½ | 27 | 0040-9204-003 | 54 |
| 8 in | 8.99 – 9.36 | ¼ × 16 | 6 — 5/8 × 19½ | 27 | 0040-0205-003 | 63 |
| 10 in | 11.04 – 11.46 | 3/8 × 16 | 8 — 5/8 × 19½ | 27 | 0040-0206-003 | 100 |
| 12 in | 13.14 – 13.56 | 3/8 × 16 | 8 — 5/8 × 19½ | 27 | 0040-0207-003 | 155 |
| 14 in | 15.30 | 3/8 × 16 | 10 — 5/8 × 19½ | 27 | 0040-8073-003 | 155 |
| 16 in | 17.40 | 3/8 × 16 | 10 — 5/8 × 19½ | 27 | 0040-8079-003 | 115 |
| 18 in | 19.50 | 3/8 × 16 | 12 — 5/8 × 19½ | 27 | 0040-8085-003 | 192 |
| 20 in | 21.60 | 3/8 × 24 | 12 — 5/8 × 28 | 27 | 0040-0001-440 | 277 |
| 24 in | 25.80 | 3/8 × 24 | 15 — 5/8 × 28 | 27 | 0040-0005-780 | 298 |
⚠ Seal Only — Pipe Joint Must Be Anchored
The Style 40 provides a pressure seal only. When pipe pullout could occur, the pipe joint must be independently anchored or restrained. Failure to anchor the joint could result in escaping line content and cause property damage, serious injury, or death. Confirm restraint requirements before installation.Consult Inside Sales For
Standard supply is Grade 27 BUNA-S gasket with fusion-bonded epoxy ID/OD coating. Contact our team for sizes over 24 in or sizes not listed, special-length middle rings, American Iron & Steel (AIS) or BABAA certification, AWWA C213 coating, all-stainless construction, or alternate gasket grades.
Ready to Order?
Confirm pipe OD, gasket grade, and any special requirements before placing your order.
Submittal
Style 38/138/40 CIP/DIP Submittal
Catalog
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 1058 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization.
The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more.
David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt.
When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters.
This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground.
I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed.
This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012
★★★★★ 5
Great book. Not an easy read but worth going ...
Format: Hardcover
Wish I had known about this book when it was published! Great book. Not an easy read but worth going thru more than once with great info. I have long held the belief of the early exodus date due to the Great Pyramid dating. Have read in many books about the confusion of the Egyptian chronology but this is the first one I've seen that really opens it up for examination.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2016
★★★★★ 4
A Lost Book doesn't Make Up for Lost Time
Format: Paperback
I bought the hard back copy of this book years ago & what an interesting read with great time lines & beautiful color photos. Someone borrowed the book & I forgot who I loaned it to. After years of trying to remember where it went, I at last bought it again as a paper back through Amazon.com. It's a used book with no marks & only a slight indentation on a few pages on the side. Now that I am looking into it & remembering it once again, I am over loaded with too many historical theories. Maybe it's my fault for being a book reader rather than an Egyptologist.
I am going to write down some simple time frame theories & you will see what this book is about:
General View: The Hebrews came into Egypt through reuniting Joseph & his brothers. They experienced the Amarna period of primitive Monotheism. Akhenaton was over thrown & polytheism was reinstated as the Hebrews were enslaved. Moses came during Rameses II & the Exodus was during the last years of Rameses II or the Pharaoh Marneptah.
Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC
Rameses II 1279-1213 BC
Exodus last years of Rameses II or Marneptah.
Problems: Biblical History is off by 180 years if counted back from the creation of Solomon's temple. Rameses II was a great conquer, & both he & his son Marneptah never wrote of 10 plagues or an Exodus. Both died as old men & their mummys are still with us.
David Rohl's Theory: revised Egyptian history by shortening the 3rd Intermediate Period by almost 300 years.
Tutimaios known as Dudimose is the Pharaoh of the Exodus
Exodus 1447 BC
Amarna period of Akhenaton = time of King David approx. 1000 BC. Proof: letters written between an Egyptian Pharaoh & King of Israel during that period.
Rameses II = Shishak of 921 BC sack of Jerusalem. Proof: Rameses II used a monogram that comes close to Shishak.
Problems: goes against establish Egyptian time frames or "If the Bible doesn't fit the Egyptian time frames then make the Egyptian time frames fit the Bible". Akhenaton is no longer the 1st political monotheist & seems out of place not influencing Moses & writing letters to King David.
From Another Book I Read - "Akhenaton & Moses" by Ahmed Osman
Ahmed Osman's Theory: Akhenaton is the same person as Moses
Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC
Exodus after the overthrow of Akhenaton by Rameses I
Problems: Moses doesn't die overlooking the Promise land of Canaan as stated in Deuteronomy 34 but dies without a known grave as did Akhenaton. Moses monotheism doesn't deal with a solar disc as a symbol of the one God or a replacement of a lesser Egyptian God, but is from an inherited convent.
Other Dates of the Exodus:
Josephus 1552 BC
Sedar Olam Rabbah 1440 BC
Book of Jubilees 2410 BC
Early Church Fathers 1570 to 1320 BC
I need to research Immanuel Velikovsky ideas on this subject matter. I just bought the book & will review it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Correcting the Biblical Chronology
Format: Hardcover
When I first begin my study of the Bible, I had purchased another book on archaeology and the first thing I realized is that nothing fit. The time of Solomon was impoverishment in Israel. When you read the Bible Solomon was the richest king ever. David Rohl's book Pharaohs and Kings changed all that. He persuasively shows where the chronology is wrong and when corrected things fall into place. What is commonly called the old testament comes to life. It is the greatest book on Biblical Archaeology ever written. Thank you David !!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019
★★★★★ 5
High quality for a slightly used book!!!!!
Format: Hardcover
Lots of pics and charts ... Egyptologists will love it
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024